Quoting Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:31:15PM -0500, Dan Melomedman wrote: > > Henning Brauer wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:07:30AM -0800, Justin Ainsworth (isp-lists) wrote: > > > > I second that motion. :-) > > > > > > > > > I do not. > > > > > > now everybody, please! > > > nah, this is no democracy, ok? > > > > Is this a code quality issue? > > I don't think the concept of just moving the files into one LDIF each is > even close to optimal.
No one (not even me) have argued this. Until someone come up with a better alternative, we can use what we have. This is ususally how development works in ANY dicipline. It's FULLY 'turn-offable' at compile time, so it doesn't COST anything (more than a few extra bytes to download the patch) to anyone, only gives benefits to those (few?) that use it... No one have even ATTEMPTED to come up with a better alternative (not even teoreticly!!) so take what's at hand. I have a working version, you don't even have a theoretical one. -- jihad NSA ammunition tritium Ft. Bragg quiche subway Soviet president munitions iodine Mossad Rule Psix SEAL Team 6 North Korea [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
