On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 09:16:47AM +0100, Rok Papez wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:51:17 +0100 (MET), Stefan Paletta wrote:
>
> >I don't know for sure (FATfs at least hasn't).
> >The question is rather, does cygwin have inode numbers?
> >I just tried (on 95) and "ls -i" reports something reasonable.
>
> All FSs have a unique ID for a smallest allocation block they can
> allocate. FAT does *not* have an inode number, but it *has* cluster
> number; cluster number is unique just in the same way as inode
> number.
Until DEFRAG runs, that is.
Greetz, Peter.
[sigless]
