On Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:51:17 +0100 (MET), Stefan Paletta wrote:
>I don't know for sure (FATfs at least hasn't).
>The question is rather, does cygwin have inode numbers?
>I just tried (on 95) and "ls -i" reports something reasonable.
All FSs have a unique ID for a smallest allocation block they can
allocate. FAT does *not* have an inode number, but it *has* cluster
number; cluster number is unique just in the same way as inode
number.
best regards,
Rok Papez,
Student at Faculty of Computer and Information Science,
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
