Rok Papez writes: > Who is talking about two "Reply-To:" fields ???? Anybody who suggests that the Reply-To should be set to "the" list. What happens when mail is sent to multiple lists? Each sets the Reply-To to its own list, and the discussion is immediately fragmented. Doh! -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Russ Allbery
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Rok Papez
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Peter Green
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Peter Green
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Roman V. Isaev
- RE: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Mark Bainter
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Rok Papez
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Peter van Dijk
- Trigger help and adduser scripts Russell Nelson
- Trigger help and adduser scripts jjsimond
- Re: Trigger help and adduser scripts Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Trigger help and adduser scripts Russell Nelson
- Re: Trigger help and adduser scripts Scott D. Yelich
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: rbrito
- RE: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Rok Papez
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Keith Burdis
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Rok Papez
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: Rok Papez
- Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo: rok . papez