On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Martin wrote:
> Both Mdaemon and Mercury are easy to set-up. Both have a 'do not relay '
> checkbox Both are secure and functional, if you ignore windows95/98 and NT.
> Both have built-in mailing lists. Mdaeon you have to pay for (but it's worth
> it), Mercury (Pegasus's companion) is free as is Pegasus.
Yes, I used to use Mercury but it was awkward because my NT system
wasn't turned on 24 hours a day. My Linux box is turned on all the
time so it makes much more sense to me to use qmail.
> Still, I want Qmail and Ezmlm because they appear to be the best and most
> secure. I like the thought that has gone into them.
>
Quite, but it would be *even better* if qmail was as easy to set up as
Mercury. Maybe what I'm after is qmail-lite which is easy to set up
rather than efficient.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
