Both Mdaemon and Mercury are easy to set-up. Both have a 'do not relay ' checkbox Both are secure and functional, if you ignore windows95/98 and NT. Both have built-in mailing lists. Mdaeon you have to pay for (but it's worth it), Mercury (Pegasus's companion) is free as is Pegasus. Still, I want Qmail and Ezmlm because they appear to be the best and most secure. I like the thought that has gone into them. M. -- \\\\\// \\|// _\\|//_ | | _\\|//_ \\|// (@ @) (' 0-0 ') (.) (.) (' @-@ ') (o-o) +-=oOOo-(_)-oOOo=oo0=(_)=0oo=oOO=-(_)-=OOo=oo0=(_)=0oo=oOOo-(_)-oOOo=-+
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for se... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Fabrice Scemama
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Adam D. McKenna
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Patrick Berry
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail ddb
- Fwd: Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail ivan
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Martin
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Chris Green
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Fabrice Scemama
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for sendmail Jordan Krushen