Re: Kurt's Closet on qmail

[Eric Rahmig]

Russell Nelson writes:
>Lyndon Griffin writes:
> > thanks everyone for the quick response...  now, my next question - does it
> > not seem a little extreme to say that simply
> >     "qmail 1.03 no longer supports inetd."
> > and then link to the ucspi-tcp package, which you kinda have to figure out
> > for yourself that that's what the link is trying to tell you, when it is, as
> > you all say, quite possible that qmail-smptd WILL run under inetd (maybe OS
> > dependent)?
>
>Maybe we just have too high an opinion of your intelligence?

Come on, is this kind of comment really necessary?  Good grief.

--
Eric Rahmig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]