Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:43:37AM -0600, > David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > True; but if you're modifying existing files, the directory data to > > locate it is already safely on disk; only the timestamp might be > > wrong. This isn't the qmail situation, but it's an important real > > situation, and suggests a reason why it makes sense to to separate > > file sync and directory sync. Maybe. > > Another situation is when dealing with several files in the same directory. > You need to fsync each file, but you only need to fsync the directory once. And how does this help you with qmail? -- Andre
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupda... Jeff Hayward
- Re: egg on MY face Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Egg on my face Dave Sill
- Re: Egg on my face Sam
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Magnus Bodin
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: Linux kernel turning for m... Len Budney
- Re: Logging information about each email. Bill Parker
- Re: Logging information about each email. Chris Johnson
- Re: Logging information about each email. Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: Logging information about each email. Greg Owen