[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> False. Mail will not be lost if if rename() or link() (depending on > >Who said anything about the message already being on the filesystem? If it's not, then qmail hasn't accepted responsibility for delivering the message, so the sender, either local or remote, should resend it. -Dave
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Andre Oppermann
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Len Budney
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates cmikk
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Andre Oppermann
- Re: qmail on FFS with softupdates Jeff Hayward
- Re: egg on MY face Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Egg on my face Dave Sill
- Re: Egg on my face Sam
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... Andre Oppermann
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... Magnus Bodin
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was Re: Linux ... Andre Oppermann
- Re: Linux kernel turning for mail perfo... Len Budney
- Re: Logging information about each email. Bill Parker