Andre Oppermann writes: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > Another situation is when dealing with several files in the same directory. > > You need to fsync each file, but you only need to fsync the directory once. > > And how does this help you with qmail? If, just *if*, you were designing a new version of qmail, and wished to ensure that it worked well with THE most popular version of Unix, you might choose to take that into account. Or not. I don't know any more than you do. But still. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your country 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | can force other people to Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | do for you..." -Perry M.
- Re: Journalling and email loss Anthony DeBoer
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Journalling and email loss Len Budney
- Re: Journalling and email loss Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Egg on my face Dave Sill
- Re: Egg on my face Sam
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Russell Nelson
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Magnus Bodin
- Re: OT: fsync semantics (was R... Andre Oppermann
- Re: Linux kernel turning for m... Len Budney
- Re: Logging information about each email. Bill Parker
- Re: Logging information about each email. Chris Johnson
- Re: Logging information about each email. Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: Logging information about each email. Greg Owen