Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying!

[Michael T. Babcock]

David Dyer-Bennet wrote:

>  > I would have to agree with the multiple connections == bad neighbour behaviour
>  > (if this is true).
>  >
>  > I might encourage re-ordering of sends to have parallel, per-MX queues ...
>
> This is very hard to do, and expensive.  And it would slow down mail
> delivery, both overall and to each destination.  And it would increase
> disk IO.  Why would one want to do this?

I said why.  I just wanted to have the concept evaluated outside the 'its simply a 
stupid
idea' crowd if at all possible.