Eric Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Some would argue that MAPS abused their position when they listed ORBS - > they do have a competing service, do they not? And ORBS is both spamming and operating a spam support service under the definition of that service. Suppose you run a security consulting service and as part of that service you publish vulnerabilities in commonly used products, as well as provide a network scanner. Now suppose you find a security vulnerability in someone else's network scanner. Do you publish that vulnerability? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... Peter van Dijk
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Nicolas MONNET
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Eric Cox
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Brian Johnson
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb... Russ Allbery
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mai... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Russ Allbery
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of... Jenny Holmberg
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Greg Owen
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Brian Johnson
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! James Raftery
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Frank Tegtmeyer
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- RE: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Frank Tegtmeyer