please send me your followup.
Thanks,
David
on 9/18/00 10:25 PM, James T. Perry at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> "Austad, Jay" wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, I installed the boxes that need the modification
>> with an rpm. I suppose this will possibly screw things up if
>> I use some binaries from a tarball and some from the possibly
>> modified rpm version.
>
> I just accomplished patching the big-concurrency patch and I
> wouldn't mind helping out but I did everything from tar balls.
>
> If its a stock linux, you may face some compiling errors like
> I did. Luckily, I was guided from very generous people on this
> list so I succeeded, and I wrote a follow-up that you could
> search for in the archives, or I can send it if you want.
>
> I run an RPM based LINUX also, but followed Life with Qmail:
> http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
> very closely and was up and running very quickly.
>
> cheers,
> jamie
>
> ps
> I thought RPMs were nice at the beginning, but after a
> while RPMs became more of limitations in most cases.
>
> #---------#---------#---------#---------#---------#---------#---------#
> -- If somebody can help create a search engine for my room,
> I will call them a Saint...
> GUI == Graphical User Interference
