On 07-Oct-2000, Charles McLagan wrote: > So the question is: is there a sensible (or kludgey, hack, > yet sufficient) way to cope with it today? Mutt understands "Mail-Followup-To:" (MFT) and can be set to honor that header. If you tell Mutt that you are subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] then it will generate the appropriate MFT header (see mine). Later on if another Mutt user replies to my message, the reply will only be sent to the qmail list by default, provided he/she enables the honor-mft option. http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#using_lists Ronny
- Re: qmail list reply-to Kris Kelley
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Robin S. Socha
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Ronny Haryanto
- Re: qmail list reply-to Andy Bradford
- Re: qmail list reply-to Raul Miller
- Re: qmail list reply-to Adam McKenna
- OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list reply-to... Mike Glover
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Brett Randall
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... David L. Nicol
- Re: OT: a "real" MUA for X? (was qmail list repl... Dave Sill