>
> Al, please don't talk about stuff you don't understand.
> It's not a "product", it's free software.
>
Wrong. Talked to an attorney last night who specializes in this kind of
litigation. Person(s) X wrote code and person Y suffered a loss as a result
of using that code. It does not matter if a "charge" or "payment" is
involved.
> And if there was any precedent for taking a software maker to a court
> for his bad software quality, California would have to declare
> bankruptcy. Then you have more problems that a few free software
> hackers.
>
When did California become known for software manufacture? Are you thinking
of Washington?
