On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:43:25PM +0000, Greg Cope wrote: >Would this still be a good idea ? As a 256 meg dim is 108 UK pounds >sterling - or less than a SCSI card ... I can't say... I used such a setup on a system with 1GB RAM sending out 1+million e-mails of the sort you are. It was more painful to manage, but worked. If you need the performance, then there's not much choice. Sean -- I thought Bush and Gore were both bad choices. However, Bush seems to be doing his best to prove he's the greatest of two evils. Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
- Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ? Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... David L. Nicol
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/que... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmai... Mark Delany
- RE: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Austad, Jay