On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 05:46:51PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote: > David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > > Um, most reporting measured results from optimizing high-traffic > > qmail-based mail servers have found that disk activity on the queue > > disk is the first limit they hit. > > > How about, if the first delivery fails, pass it off to a server with > some disks. Why not pre-process with qmail-remote before queueing? qmail-remote is way too late as most of the I/O load is putting the mail in the queue, not getting it off. Besides, the symptom isn't delivery failure, it's slowness. Regards.
- Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ? Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... David L. Nicol
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/que... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmai... Mark Delany
- RE: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Austad, Jay