Thus spake Greg Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Has anyone any empirical evidence for the speed increases I may expect > (as opposed to a fast EIDI (ATA 66, 8.5ms seek) or SCSI system (eg 10k, > 5.3 ms seek 25mb/s) ? Why would you expect a speed increase at all? And even if there were one, would anyone notice? Who looks at his email every millisecond and would even notice the improvement? I would suspect that your mail service, like everyone else's, is not limited by disk throughput, but by network throughput. Or are you delivering all those emails locally? Felix
- Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ? Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Greg Cope
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Felix von Leitner
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoug... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue t... David L. Nicol
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/que... Mark Delany
- Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmai... Mark Delany
- RE: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ... Austad, Jay