On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 03:35:11PM -0700, Travis Turner wrote:
> Oh so the fact that you answer a few questions
I wasn't referring to me.
> allows you to be omniscient
> in deciding who gets flamed.
1. No one has ever sought my permission to flame anyone.
2. In over a year on this list, I have flamed one person over a
particularly appalling round of idiocy. Hardly omniscient.
3. Dave doesn't flame people at all.
4. Charles doesn't flame unless provoked. He first suggests using the
available documentation, gets flamed (no, those people didn't consult
me either) and replies.
> Your intellect knows no
> bounds.
Er, yeah it does. Charles answers *far* more questions than I'm able to.
> I believe your argument has some flaws though.
I'd be curious what they are. You've only insulted me; you've said
nothing about my argument.
Tim
--
* * * | 1) It's SLOW! --> "man tcpserver" - especially -R,-H,-l
qmail | 2) Roaming users --> http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying
FAQS | 3) Secondary MX --> list in rcpthosts, NOT in locals/virtualdomains
* * * | 4) Discard mail --> "#" line ONLY, in appropriate .qmail file
