Besides, ORBS is dead!
http://www.orbs.org/
Or, is that the wrong site?
David
Mark wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:17:50AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz allegedly wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > > Furthermore, Alan Brown's activities are not illegal - the ORBS
> > > relaytester runs in The Netherlands, where this is not illegal by any
> > > law.
> >
> > Maybe in Netherlands is not illegal, but in Netherlands even euthanasia
> > is legal by any law, in other countries not! The tester is in Netherlands
> > but it otucomes follow results in other countries, where performing
> > such lists and testing, which seeks the vulnerabilities in servers
> > and helps hackers at attacks, is illegal. From corespondence on this
> > list can be considered, that in US, NZ is illegal, in my country (Poland)
> > too. So, if Netherland will be right to others, probably shall give
> > this same injunction as NZ High Court - this want only a lot time
>
> I'm confused. Isn't the use of ORBS entirely voluntary? I don't see
> how any site on the Internet is obliged to accept any traffic at
> all. So, if a site chooses to reject traffic based on a list -
> regardless of how flawed it may be - what's the big deal?
>
> But I fail see the relevance to qmail...
>
> Regards.
