On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:59:38AM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
>
> > Can you please get over this? The evidence you posted last year was
> > flawed, it did not link ORBS to a few probes from Romania. You have no
> > proof that ORBS is somehow worse than any other list of IPs.
>
> 1) My host was by me secured (qmail+tcpserver with no open relay)
> but A. Brown hasn't removed me form his list
That's a valid complaint.
> 2) The hacking proof was repeated each time, when tester was active
> with performing with test
The ORBS tester is not engaging in any form of computer trespass. If
you don't want people connecting to your SMTP service, take steps to
remove it from the public Internet.
> 3) Each hacker can read and such list are for his the great
> direction, where seek. Problem was, that in this time this
> server was already secured and all was written to logs
Publishing a list of IPs is not a crime.
> 4) With A. Brown was no discussion. I have asked him to break
> test but he has me adviced to turn off my server
Interesting.
> 5) I have blocked my server with command to tcpserver
> "=.nl:deny" and since this time all hacking proof
> has been finished and no longer has been reported.
> Since this time all problems with them has been finished
>
> I'm very happy thaht NZ Court has been this same opinion
> as I.
The NZ court action has nothing to do with computer trespass if I'm
not mistaken.
