On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 11:20, Rick Widmer wrote: > Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > > > I see that it is in the plans for vpopmail to merge in the new > > spamassassin features that Ken has written support for, which is great! > > My question is: qmailadmin already has some spamassassin support, and > > I'm trying to modify qmailadmin to support the new spamassassin stuff, > > so is it ok to remove the old stuff and put the new stuff in? Or should > > I try to have support for both? > > > > I suggest the goal should be to let vpopmail do the work and make > qmailadmin as much as possible just a web interface to the vpopmail library.
yea, but there's that old spam command stuff which is interfering with the changes I'm making. I just wrote it to stomp on the old stuff since we have no customers actually using the --enable-spam-command stuff, and have high demand for being able to switch the spamassassin stuff on/off on a per user basis via qmailadmin. I'm making a second post to actually post the patch. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party! ..................... Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. www.inter7.com 866.528.3530 toll free 847.492.0470 int'l 847.492.0632 fax GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE
