I was actually thinking about distributing unpatched binaries for all
djb licensed stuff and have yum patch them using binary diffs.
Seems a bit complicated and a lot could go wrong thoguh . . .
On 4/27/07, Warren (mailing lists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it means that you cannot distribute binary (compiled) RPMs. So
while .src.rpm files are OK, i386.rpm or .x86_64.rpm is not allowed.
The only way I could think of around this would be to distribute
tarballs of the source as .i386.rpm and have the postinstall script
actually compile and install it.
W
Aaron Johnson wrote:
> Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
>> We talked about this several months back. The main problem is that,
>> by its license, qmail can only be distributed as source, yum is
>> generally for installing object rpms.
> I assume that means that you cannot install both the compiled qmail and
> source at the same time?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
