Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first mean getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.
W On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html > > > > http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html > > > > > > > > I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! > > Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster > > packages!? > > > > Johannes > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > |--------------------------------- > > | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer > > | information technologies > > | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 > > |----------------------------------------------------------->> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have > done this a few years ago... > Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince distributors > to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt > package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice treat... Am I > dreaming? > > But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and > hussle free... > > I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway, it's great news... :) > > -- > AM > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
