It won't be the default, it'll be up to every admin to choose.

Erik

On Dec 6, 2007 8:28 AM, Justice London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The plan sounds, sound... but I would worry about putting a yum update
> for this anywhere near a cronjob.  There have been enough as far as
> issues I've seen when dealing with normal system updating via automated
> yum, let alone mail.  If nothing else, I would think it a good idea not
> to make that default.
>
> Justice
>
>
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:17 -0800, Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> > The QmailToaster will not be merged into some other repo. I will be
> > creating a repo for the QmailToaster only.
> >
> > This is because automatic updates for things in rpmforge are okay, but
> > require a little special care on the QmailToaster.
> >
> > For example if you update spamassassin while the server is live,
> > spamassassin will no longer be able to find the supplemental files
> > needed and crash. A newer clamdscan trying to access an older clamd
> > may crash.
> >
> > Because of this there will be a qmailtoaster repo and an update
> > script, to be run via cron or manually, that does the following:
> >
> > 1) Shut down qmail
> > 2) Run yum --enablerepo=qmailtoaster update, as our repo file will
> > always be enabled=0
> > 3) Qmail cdb
> > 4) Start Qmail
> >
> > Also, all config files are going to be broken out into a separate rpm
> > just for config files called config-toaster. This will never be
> > updated, to ensure that your configs persist after every update.
> >
> > Hope this helps clarify things a bit.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Erik
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 9:52 AM, Joseph Lundgren
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It's actually much easier than that.  RPMForge is set up to handle "2nd
> > > party" RPMs.  http://rpmforge.net/user/faq/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From the CentOS wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge ):
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > RPMForge is a collaboration of Dag, Dries, and other packagers. They 
> > > provide
> > > over 2600 packages for CentOS, including mplayer, xmms-mp3, and other
> > > popular media tools. It is not part of RedHat or CentOS but is designed to
> > > work with these major distributions.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I haven't personally experienced the process of submitting RPMs for
> > > inclusion to the RPMForge, but I imagine it's quite reasonable.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Joseph Lundgren
> > >
> > > Systems Engineer
> > >
> > > Peak Internet, LLC
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 9:38 AM
> > >  To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > >  Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Getting into CentOS would mean either having it in the extras repo (fine
> > > with me) or convincing RedHat to include it in RHEL, which would first 
> > > mean
> > > getting it into Fedora and making sure it is stable.
> > >
> > >  W
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/11/30, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> > >
> > >  http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't
> > > it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster 
> > > packages!?
> > >
> > >  Johannes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  --
> > >
> > >
> > >  |---------------------------------
> > >  |  weberhofer GmbH               | Johannes Weberhofer
> > >  |  information technologies
> > >  |  Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3
> > >  |----------------------------------------------------------->>
> > >
> > >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >       QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >  This is indeed good news for us. Even though I believe DJB should have 
> > > done
> > > this a few years ago...
> > >  Now all we (all qmail users/admins) have to do is to convince 
> > > distributors
> > > to supply a qmail package in their distros... that would be nice... a qmt
> > > package in fedora/suse/mandriva/centos would be a nice treat... Am I
> > > dreaming?
> > >
> > >  But first all the patches and necessary changes to it must be stable and
> > > hussle free...
> > >
> > >  I think we'll have to way and see... but anyway,  it's great news... :)
> > >
> > >  --
> > >  AM
> > >  agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to