>On 10/01/12 13:28, John Spackman wrote: >> I wouldn't want to check a website daily either my preference is >> definitely for email or at a pinch RSS, and fragmented or duplicate >> postings would be a step backwards IMHO. > >I'm not exactly sure why a forum would be more prone to duplicates.
If the ML existed parallel to the forum I could see the same question being asked in more than one place - anyone who was following both would see a duplicate. >If anything, a mailing list is quite prone to people asking the same >question over and over, because: >- a newcomer doesn't have the ML archive to search in My private ML archive is pretty big now, but if I have a question I usually google for it first rather than search in Outlook - nabble is perfectly visible to google, it may be ugly but it works really well. >- on-line ML archive interfaces suck enough that nobody ever bothers >searching in them I agree that the ML UI isn't great, but not bothering to search is a user problem not a technology problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
