There is a legal doubt about NMS and it will subsist. This is why I was suggesting that we leave a potential AMQP support to the NMS people. We should therefore concentrate on straight WCF, BizTalk supports.
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 07:59 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > Robert Greig wrote: > > On 11/06/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Even the ActiveMQ guys cannot agree. As a potential Qpid implementation > >> of NMS would be hosted by their project they should decide whether this > >> is useful to have one and also take responsibility for potential legal > >> aspects. > > > > OK but this impacts us in the sense that we would be doing the > > implementation? > > > > Surely we should not be putting effort into something where the legal > > position is not clear? What are we supposed to say to our users? "Use > > this but we can't decide whether it's violating a licence agreement"? > > > > RG > > I have not read through all the threads on the topic, but if there is > legal doubt about it > , it would make sense to explore all other alternatives first. > > Carl. > > >
