Hiram, Sorry for the statement "Even the ActiveMQ guys cannot agree" but I thought that "Paul Fremantle" was an ActiveMQ contributor.
As you said we need legal council to provide an opinion on the situation. But from the Qpid/AMQP point of view I am more worry about NMS confusing people rather than introducing legal issues. Arnaud On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:53 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote: > I was just trying to clear up the earlier statement that "Even the > ActiveMQ guys cannot agree." I don't think any of the ActiveMQ guys > thought that NMS would have any problems. I think we can all agree > that we would like legal council to provide an opinion on the > situation, but I don't think it's fair to say that "Even the ActiveMQ > guys cannot agree." > > Regards, > Hiram > > On 6/11/07, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/06/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > All the ActiveMQ guys seem to be of the opinion that NMS is legal. > > > Please stop the FUD. > > > > With the greatest respect, we are really looking for expert legal > > opinion on this matter. Have you taken legal advice on this? > > > > Robert > > > >
