Hi,
On 6/11/07, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to the discussion we have had on the ActiveMQ mailing list, it
looks as if it is impossible to make a decision on whether implementing
NMS is legal or not.
Even the ActiveMQ guys cannot agree.
All the ActiveMQ guys seem to be of the opinion that NMS is legal.
Please stop the FUD.
If you guys want FUD, please consider that the same folks who
developed NMS helped develop the AMQP specification so the same
alleged 'taint' that is being claimed against NMS would also apply to
AMQP.
As a potential Qpid implementation
of NMS would be hosted by their project they should decide whether this
is useful to have one and also take responsibility for potential legal
aspects.
Arnaud
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 15:56 +0100, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Take a look at this - it might amuse you
>
> http://smallprint.netzoo.net/reag/
>
> Paul
>
> On 6/6/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great! My infallable plan for world domination:
> >
> > "By opening this email, you agree that you have read, understood, and will
> > comply with all of the terms
> > and conditions set forth herein"
> >
> > You will, pass this on to everyone you know.
> > Agree to everything I say from now on.
> >
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
