You can not seriously tell me that because you've read the JMS spec you may not write a spec for a messaging protocol, without breaking the rules of the JMS spec. This discussion is bordering on the ridiculous.
On 11/06/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/11/07, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "..please consider that the same folks who developed NMS helped develop the > AMQP specification so the same alleged 'taint' that is being claimed against > NMS would also apply to AMQP." > > To clarify. > James is not the source of any of the content of the AMQP specification thru > v0-9, to the best of my knowledge. So I've just been through my AMQP spec emails; The first version I was sent was 0.3a4 in August 2004 then I contributed to the specification up to around April 2005 when it had reached around 0.81a. So what happened to the specification I worked on? Was a new group formed excluding all the folks who were on the mailing list I was on (including yourself John you were on the mailing list with me) and were all versions of AMQP destroyed and a new cleanroom version created after 0.81a, ignoring all that previous work? -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
