Yep, But not a whole lot of info here. Looks like most hung during the
initial connection stage.

root     14304  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun07   0:00 popper -s
Jun  7 20:57:58 sammy popper[14304]: connect from port24-quit.netpathway.com

root     14945  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun07   0:00 popper -s
Jun  7 21:00:55 sammy popper[14945]: connect from port24-quit.netpathway.com

root      3706  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun08   0:00 popper -s
Jun  8 14:40:11 sammy popper[3706]: connect from port84-quit.netpathway.com

sizz     28775  0.0  0.1  1596  904 ?        S    Jun09   0:00 popper -s
Jun  9 06:19:22 sammy popper[28775]: connect from port30-quit.netpathway.com

root       910  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun09   0:00 popper -s
Jun  9 06:58:25 sammy popper[910]: connect from port16-quit.netpathway.com

root     13956  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun09   0:00 popper -s
un  9 10:28:41 sammy popper[13956]: connect from port87-quit.netpathway.com

root     14127  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun09   0:00 popper -s
Jun  9 01:13:26 sammy popper[14127]: connect from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun  9 01:13:26 sammy popper[14127]: Stats: marie 0 0 2 2776 paul.netpathway.com 
208.137.139.7
Jun  9 10:29:28 sammy popper[14127]: connect from port87-quit.netpathway.com

root     29970  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun09   0:00 popper -s
Jun  9 11:41:30 sammy popper[29970]: connect from port20-quit.netpathway.com

root     25982  0.0  0.1  1448  588 ?        S    Jun11   0:00 popper -s
Jun 11 17:59:03 sammy popper[25982]: connect from port15-quit.netpathway.com

tddear   31180  0.0  0.1  1596  904 ?        S    10:41   0:00 popper -s
Jun 12 10:42:06 sammy popper[31180]: connect from port10-newt.netpathway.com

laurent  12054  0.0  0.1  1596  904 ?        S    15:50   0:00 popper -s
Jun 12 15:50:28 sammy popper[12054]: connect from port33-quit.netpathway.com
Jun 12 15:50:29 sammy popper[12054]: Stats: laurent 0 0 0 0 port33-quit.netpathway.com 
208.137.139.50


> do you have a log you can grep for their pids, to see what went on with
> them?
>
> -Tony
> .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
> Anthony J. Biacco                       Network Administrator/Engineer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Intergrafix Internet Services
>
>     "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
> http://www.asteroid-b612.org               http://www.intergrafix.net
> .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
>
> > I cleared all the processes. I will do an strace on the next stale process.
> >
> > Randall Gellens wrote:
> >
> > > At 3:54 PM -0500 6/12/01, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
> > >
> > > >  Can anybody explain why qpopper leaves these stale processes.
> > > >  At the time I listed these processes only 2 were actually
> > > >  active.
> > >
> > > What does a truss(1) or strace(1) on them show?  If you don't have
> > > truss(1) or strace(1), use whatever system call trace facility is
> > > available on your platform.
> >
> > --
> > Gary White               Network Administrator
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]          Internet Pathway
> > Voice 601-776-3355            Fax 601-776-2314
> >
> >
> >

--
Gary White               Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          Internet Pathway
Voice 601-776-3355            Fax 601-776-2314


Reply via email to