is this with one of '-T' or 'set tracefile=' used?
or no tracing?
standalone, inet?
-Tony
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services
"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://www.asteroid-b612.org http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
> Yep, But not a whole lot of info here. Looks like most hung during the
> initial connection stage.
>
> root 14304 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun07 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 7 20:57:58 sammy popper[14304]: connect from port24-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 14945 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun07 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 7 21:00:55 sammy popper[14945]: connect from port24-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 3706 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun08 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 8 14:40:11 sammy popper[3706]: connect from port84-quit.netpathway.com
>
> sizz 28775 0.0 0.1 1596 904 ? S Jun09 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 9 06:19:22 sammy popper[28775]: connect from port30-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 910 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun09 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 9 06:58:25 sammy popper[910]: connect from port16-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 13956 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun09 0:00 popper -s
> un 9 10:28:41 sammy popper[13956]: connect from port87-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 14127 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun09 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 9 01:13:26 sammy popper[14127]: connect from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jun 9 01:13:26 sammy popper[14127]: Stats: marie 0 0 2 2776 paul.netpathway.com
>208.137.139.7
> Jun 9 10:29:28 sammy popper[14127]: connect from port87-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 29970 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun09 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 9 11:41:30 sammy popper[29970]: connect from port20-quit.netpathway.com
>
> root 25982 0.0 0.1 1448 588 ? S Jun11 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 11 17:59:03 sammy popper[25982]: connect from port15-quit.netpathway.com
>
> tddear 31180 0.0 0.1 1596 904 ? S 10:41 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 12 10:42:06 sammy popper[31180]: connect from port10-newt.netpathway.com
>
> laurent 12054 0.0 0.1 1596 904 ? S 15:50 0:00 popper -s
> Jun 12 15:50:28 sammy popper[12054]: connect from port33-quit.netpathway.com
> Jun 12 15:50:29 sammy popper[12054]: Stats: laurent 0 0 0 0
>port33-quit.netpathway.com 208.137.139.50
>
>
> > do you have a log you can grep for their pids, to see what went on with
> > them?
> >
> > -Tony
> > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
> > Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services
> >
> > "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
> > http://www.asteroid-b612.org http://www.intergrafix.net
> > .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
> >
> > > I cleared all the processes. I will do an strace on the next stale process.
> > >
> > > Randall Gellens wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 3:54 PM -0500 6/12/01, Gary White (Network Administrator) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can anybody explain why qpopper leaves these stale processes.
> > > > > At the time I listed these processes only 2 were actually
> > > > > active.
> > > >
> > > > What does a truss(1) or strace(1) on them show? If you don't have
> > > > truss(1) or strace(1), use whatever system call trace facility is
> > > > available on your platform.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gary White Network Administrator
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Pathway
> > > Voice 601-776-3355 Fax 601-776-2314
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Gary White Network Administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Pathway
> Voice 601-776-3355 Fax 601-776-2314
>
>
>
