<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the qrplist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Jeff and the gang;

Well Jeff, your remarks below of course begs this question:

Do *YOU* feel that there is not a "crisis" with the ARRL at the current
time concerning their "bandwidth proposal" and how it is/was being handled
?

Vy 72;

Bob
w9ya


>
> Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the qrplist gang
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> John,
>
> I'm really glad to see that you have rejoined the ARRL.
>
> Your comments about hams being "militantly against doing ANYTHING" is
> an interesting observation. I think *everyone* on QRP-L had an
> opinion about the Winlink and regulation by bandwidth stuff but many
> of us just chose not to voice it in that forum. When few people
> joined in that discussion you and others assumed that no one cared
> much about these issues.
>
> But if in fact few people cared, it would be pretty easy to
> understand why...
>
> Frankly, I've grown weary of the 'perpetual crisis' that is amateur
> radio. I mean, every day there is some new threat or crisis that
> demands attention. It's been that way since I joined the hobby in   1977
> and from what I can tell, it has always been that way. From the   Navy
> Department not wanting to give the bands back to us after WWI to   CW
> replacing Spark, from the WWII suspension to SSB replacing AM.
>  From Incentive Licensing to No Code licensing, and now BPL to
> regulation by bandwidth -- this is a hobby that always has a boogie
> man around the corner waiting to ruin it forever.
>
> Take a cross section of just the recent posts on QRP-L and you see a
> litany of crisis:
>
> - Dropping the code crisis
> - Winlink 2000 crisis
> - BPL crisis
> - Dumbing down the service crisis
> - ARRL sells us out crisis
> - Regulation by bandwidth crisis
>
> And this all in a 30 day period on a list that is supposed to be
> mostly about people building two-transistor transceivers that run on
> 9v batteries. It's pretty heady stuff and after a while, it wears me
> down ... as it probably has done many of the 300,000 hams who hold a
> license but no longer get on the air.
>
> Sometimes it's difficult to find anyone who is actually happy with
> this hobby -- at least on a mailing list. Apparently these lists are
> just an electronic stage for people who would be otherwise ignored by
> the masses to vent their frustrations.
>
> Actually operating on the air is different ... I can't recall ever
> having a CW QSO with someone who wanted to bash the ARRL, fret about
> BPL or discuss regulation by bandwidth, etc. That may be different on
> phone, but I don't recall it on CW.
>
> I suppose there's a lesson in there, but no one will get it--at least
> not on a mailing list.
>
> Vy 73 de Jeff
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 3:52 PM, W2AGN wrote:
>
>>
>> W2AGN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the qrplist gang
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I know that this list has seen little activity, but I find it
>> fascinating that after a tremendous flurry of activity, mostly 'I'm
>> here, are you here?" type of stupid messages on the new, strictly
>> moderated QRP-Z (QRP-Zero)list, activity has dropped to nothing.
>>
>> I also note no activity on Hamregs. As I said in my parting shot to
>> QRP-Losers, the majority of hams are militantly against doing
>> ANYTHING! I actually rejoined ARRL just to have a voice, although
>> Bernie, who used to at least respond to emails, refuses to respond
>> now. Haynie actually called me a "trouble-maker." Of course, as I
>> said, the ARRL is NOT run by the Directors. The Executive
>> Committee, led with an iron hand by Sumner, makes the decisions,   and
>> the BOD rubber stamps them. Even the President is just a
>> figurehead, to go speak at Hamfests, etc.
>
> --
> Jeff, KE9V
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Behalf of Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Submissions:        [email protected]
> Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe qrplist in
> body Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of
> message Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
> Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------



----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Behalf of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions:        [email protected]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe qrplist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to