I don't have a strong opinion on this, but each of the suggested terms
has its own shortcoming.
Domain is overused
logical-table is a little too long
vrf is a little ambiguous
The best thing I could came up with was LRF, since we are still talking
about a VRF related feature, but we don't want to use the name VRF.
LRF : Logical Routing and Forwarding
vs VRF : Virtual Routing and Forwarding
Close enough name to imply relationship, but not quite the same to avoid
confusion. Now you can start calling the tables: LRF table 1, LRF table
2, LRF table 3,...
Cheers,
Jafar
On 6/12/2015 11:06 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:01, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
[snip]
After the last three patches, I've one more ready in my queue to
rename vrf to domain because the term 'vrf' is too controversial.
Not sure: was there a consensus on the name?
domain? logical-table? vrf?
Regards,
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
