I don't have a strong opinion on this, but each of the suggested terms
has its own shortcoming.
Domain is overused
logical-table is a little too long
vrf is a little ambiguous
The best thing I could came up with was LRF, since we are still talking
about a VRF related feature, but ewe don't want to use the name VRF.
LRF : Logical Routing and Forwarding
vs VRF : Virtual Routing and Forwarding
Close enough name to imply relationship, but not the quite the same to
avoid confusion. Now you can start calling the tables LRF table 1, LRF
table 2, LRF table 3,...
Cheers,
Jafar
On 6/12/2015 11:06 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:01, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
[snip]
After the last three patches, I've one more ready in my queue to
rename vrf to domain because the term 'vrf' is too controversial.
Not sure: was there a consensus on the name?
domain? logical-table? vrf?
Regards,
Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
