On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Paul Jakma wrote:
If CE is meant to be some way to get around the fact that some patches in the backlog have review comments outstanding; and the contributor concerned thinks it easier to engineer a crisis than just engage with review comments and address them via revisions and/or persuasion, then, sorry, no.
A much better way forward is to just roll up the sleeves, and get the nits addressed, and do the (trial) rebases to see what depends on what and what can easily be triaged ahead and gotten in.
This isn't rocket science. Integration work (review, nits, reconciling, etc.) can be very tedious - esp when lots of it has built up in different directions.
However, the best answer to such a problem is to _just get it done_. regards, -- Paul Jakma | p...@jakma.org | @pjakma | Key ID: 0xD86BF79464A2FF6A Fortune: But like the Good Book says... There's BIGGER DEALS to come! _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
