Unruh wrote: > "David J Taylor" [] >> In view of the popularity of the GPS18-LVC it's a pity that the >> driver support for the leap second isn't better, but I appreciate >> that being able to test once every few years doesn't make things any >> easier! > > As far as I can see, the GPS18-LVC unit does NOT warn of leapseconds. > There is absolutely nothing the driver can do if the information is > not supplied by > the GPS unit.
Yes, that was poorly worded - I meant "shouldn't NTP note the leap-second flags from the other Internet upstream servers, and base its whole second values on those sources during a leap-second update, using just the PPS part of the GPS signal?" The would appear to apply to any GPS source which is PPS + NMEA.... David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
