On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:09 PM, unruh <un...@invalid.ca> wrote: > Unfortunately it is not that simple. That rate changes by significan > amounts. Thus the rate you get after a week may be very different than > the rate you get after an hour. That, I submit, is the chief obstacle to > having an accurate clock. And that change in rate does not fit with the > "Allan variance" assumptions (the noise source is not of the type > assumed)
You are right about that. I was going to add in a bit about how to pick the best time to look at the clock tower. But left it out because the point I was making was only that these things are not NTP specific. Details after that did not contribute the the main point. Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
