> >>> 64 bytes from 87.186.242.38: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=48.3 ms
> >> 64 bytes from 87.186.242.38: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=34.7 ms > > Reply from 87.186.242.38: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=239 I like the different TTL values, showing how many hops there are between .38 and the folks pinging it. Based on the first one, it seems reasonable to assume that .38 sends the replies with a TTL of 255. > The variation were from my daughter using the connection for > watching youtube in parallel. ( NAT hidden home network. ) http://www.bufferbloat.net/ and what they are doing might be of interest to you. rick jones -- portable adj, code that compiles under more than one compiler these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
