On Oct 25, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Sal Armoniac wrote:
> Goofy at Disneyland is a good example ... so the 28 year old man is really 
> only acting; he is engaging, for a fee, the crowds of people only as Goofy 
> and not as himself. Whether he feels liberated hugging children is irrelevant 
> to the job

I was actually considering the feelings of the parents of the children -- in 
the sense that the mask makes abhorrent behavior desirable.  (Clearly referring 
to the subset of parents who'd find a 28-year-old male reciprocating warm, 
loving gestures with a child they have never met abhorrent; I think most 
parents' knee-jerk reaction today is to think that behavior is risky or 
dangerous.)  Tangentially relating to the other example, if an adult makes a 
child persona for interacting with other children online, the scenario is 
considerable different.  Thus, it's not the nature of the mask per se as it is 
the intent of the puppeteer -- or rather, the perceived intent of the puppeteer.

It appears to me that I was unintentionally derailing the conversation toward 
one of how the law perceives chronological age.  So let me step away from that. 
 My other example weakly had to do with the idea of avatars to further be 
puppeteers of other avatars in that I realized a complex layer of avatars 
wasn't really feasible (as I said in my example about an engineer operating 
[I'm shocked "puppet" isn't also a verb] an interpretive dance avatar versus me 
operating an engineer avatar operating a dance avatar collapsing to me 
operating the dance avatar directly).  I was going off-topic with an example of 
a human 15-year-old girl creating a 37-year-old male persona online which then 
creates its own 15-year-old girl persona.

---Jason Olshefsky
http://JayceLand.com/
http://JayceLand.com/blog/




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"R-SPEC: The Rochester Speculative Literature Association" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/r-spec?hl=en.

Reply via email to