On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Per Bothner wrote:

When I change the number of parameters to a function/method (I'm doing
so right now in the Kawa implementation) I deliberately do extra work
so the compiler can catch the places I haven't changed.  For example
I keep the old method during testing with the 'final' keyword to make
sure I'm changed all the inherited methods, and then I remove it to
make sure I've changed all the call-sites.

Wouldn't a warning as opposed to an error give you the help from the compiler that you want without forcing me to do the extra work that I want to avoid?

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to