On 2/24/07, Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Marshall wrote: > Obviously Will was not suggesting that compilers reject > programs that cannot be proven to terminate. Your statement seems to miss my point but, as I said in another thread, I've given up on R6RS and only mean to kibbitz a little... sorry if I went too far.
I don't think I missed your point, but I think you didn't say what you wanted. I happen to think it would be fine for a compiler to ignore non-termination when compiling. -- ~jrm _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
