Joe Marshall wrote:
I don't think I missed your point, but I think you didn't say what you wanted.
That's my stronger intuition, too. It's freakin' hard to say exactly what I mean especially since, in some important areas, I haven't had time to personally do or check certain math.
I happen to think it would be fine for a compiler to ignore non-termination when compiling.
Which, while trivially true, if you get me, is roughly a non-sequitor. -t _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
