William D Clinger scripsit: > The question is how to proceed. Should we take the > R6RS as our base document, for example, and argue > over what to remove? Or should we take a smaller > document as our base, and decide which parts of the > R6RS should be added?
In the presence of supermajorities, that question is truly critical. With majority votes, it doesn't matter that much. > The more important question, in my opinion, is what > kind of process will work for the longer term, after > the R5RS and R6RS both become ancient history. I think that the only truly stable part of the process is step one, which says "Redesign the process." -- The Imperials are decadent, 300 pound John Cowan <[email protected]> free-range chickens (except they have http://www.ccil.org/~cowan teeth, arms instead of wings, and dinosaurlike tails). --Elyse Grasso _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
