I stand corrected about Larceny. On the higher-level point, however, I appear to be right (11 vs. 7).
Thanks Will. On Feb 23, 2009, at 7:33 AM, William D Clinger wrote: > Bill Rozas wrote: >> Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I had heard (annecdotally) >> that Larceny and Marc Feeley's were not going to conform. > > At least six implementations of the R6RS now exist, although > at most one of them is fully R6RS-conforming. Implementors > of at least eleven systems, including Marc Feeley, have stated > that they do not intend to implement the R6RS. > > Larceny has provided an R6RS-compatible mode since November > 2007. > > For most of the time since November 2007, Larceny has been > the most R6RS-compatible system available. Last August, > Matthew Flatt released PLT Scheme's R6RS test suite. Since > the release of Larceny v0.97b1 at the end of August 2008, > I believe Ypsilon is the only system that fails fewer of > the PLT tests than Larceny (which, on most platforms, fails > two). > > Will _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
