On 25-Feb-2009 Grant Rettke wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Anton van Straaten > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On the technical side, this mailing list has been quite useful during >> this election, and during the development of R6RS, but for ongoing >> dialog on multiple subjects, something more partitioned might be >> useful, to make it easier for people to tune out discussion they're >> not interested in. _How about a web-based forum with a gateway to >> mailing lists, for example? _Is that overkill, or something that >> enough people would appreciate to make it worthwhile? > > That sounds like a good idea. What would you call the mailing list > where people can talk about their rationale for wanting to be able to > say:
I never understood the reason for dividing up discussion into partitions. I would prefer to have more resources on one channel working together. It is perfectly possible to ignore discussions tha tare no longer interesting to a person. To that end, what's wrong with comp.lang.scheme? I like usenet for my discussions, and this list is annoying in that sense. -- Aaron W. Hsu <[email protected]> | <http://www.sacrideo.us> "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat +++++++++++++++ ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) ++++++++++++++ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
