On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Thomas Lord wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 22:59 -0800, Elf wrote: > >> I do not know of any other serious standards process that has intentionally >> operated amidst off-topic ramblings, spam, and newbie questions, without >> any form of moderation (ie, usenet). There may be a reason for this. > > > > Probably the reason (imo) is that your pejoratives > are misplaced. That most -- *most* -- of the discussion > is not "off topic"
With the list's permission, I will attach the last 7 days of c.l.s. for a group decision about its suitability for the r7 discussions. > and that the universal skepticism > about this standards effort and in some cases the deeper > deconstruction of the effort (and attempt to push things > to a better track) is, well, more wise. > So what's wrong with using the r6 or r7 discussion lists? They are open to the public, stay on relevant topics, aren't trivially spammable, and can be moderated if necessary. -elf _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
