Pavel Dudrenov scripsit: > Why change the name of scheme at all? Scheme is scheme, I can't even > think of a more perfect name. It's seems like changing the name would > just create more confusion then benefit. There is no need to have a > "cool new version N name", scheme is a great name already.
It's problematic in the age of Google not to have a unique name, though "scheme" does mostly find the language. -- So they play that [tune] on John Cowan their fascist banjos, eh? [email protected] --Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
