Or Hare and Brain On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Anton van Straaten<[email protected]> wrote: > Grant Rettke wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Aubrey Jaffer<[email protected]> wrote: >>> How about "Essence" for the large language and "Quintessence" for the >>> small? >> >> Your idea is nice, but the names seem a bit too literal. >> >> From a branding perspective it would throw away the last 30 years of >> investment. > > Besides, it also breaks with the history of the name itself: Schemer was > named as an intended successor to Planner and Conniver. The "R" was > lost to the ITS operating system's draconian naming limitations. > > If new names weren't such a silly idea, this would lead inevitably to > the names Cons for the small language, and Spire for the large one. > > Anton > > > _______________________________________________ > r6rs-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
