High google ranking does not seem to justify this. It feels wrong to me to rename the language. It feels like changing the identity of the language, gutting it's soul. Even thou the soul of it is not it's name, it still feels wrong.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:26 PM, John Cowan<[email protected]> wrote: > Pavel Dudrenov scripsit: > >> Why change the name of scheme at all? Scheme is scheme, I can't even >> think of a more perfect name. It's seems like changing the name would >> just create more confusion then benefit. There is no need to have a >> "cool new version N name", scheme is a great name already. > > It's problematic in the age of Google not to have a unique name, though > "scheme" does mostly find the language. > > -- > So they play that [tune] on John Cowan > their fascist banjos, eh? [email protected] > --Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
